I found Neuroprotective activities of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in an animal model of Parkinson's disease to be a breath of fresh air since it provided an example of a good immune response after reading so many articles about immune responses gone awry. This article provided a wealth of information on the roles of regulatory and effector T cells. What I found particularly interesting in this article is the fact that regulatory T cells (Tregs) provided an overwhelming neuroprotective role in the substantia nigra pars compacta as Reynolds et al reported 90% protection of the dopaminergic neurons in the nigrostriatal system. In contrast, when MPTP injected mice were treated with effector T cells (Teffs), there was little evidence (2-18%) of neuroprotection (1087). It seems as though part of the reason Tregs are so effective as neuroprotectors is that they appear to recruit other anti-inflammatory agents. The study reported "significantly higher levels of IL-10 and TGF-β in MPTP/Treg-injected mice...compared with any other MPTP-intoxicated group" (1086).
In further researching the role of T cells in neurology, I found that T cells help maintain cognitive functioning in the brain. In mice that were deficient in T cells, their learning and memory was impaired. However, when these mice were treated with transferred T cells from wild-type mice, their learning and memory deficits improved. Furthermore, Lewitus, et al showed that in vitro neural tissue treated with Teffs inhibited long term potentiation in the hippocampus which could prove to be an effective therapy for patients with MS and Alzheimer’s.
2.Lewitus G., et al. CD4+CD25- effector T cells inhibit hippocampal long term potentiation in vitro. European Journal of Neuroscience. 26: 1399-1406 (2007).
3. Polanczyk M., et al. Cutting Edge: Estrogen drives expansion of the CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell compartment. The Journal of Immunology. 173: 2227-2230 (2004).
4. Reynolds, A. et al. Neuroprotective activities of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 82: 1083-1094 (2007).
3 comments:
AlisaR495...very well written and a nice paper. I wonder...in your readings about T-cells in the maintance of neurocognitive funtion, were they Th2 cells? Were their memory issues thought to be secondary to immunopathology? (i.e., Type II?) If so, this is a very interesting application the idea that Th2 cells (as opposed to Th1) may be protective in this condition. Only curious. TLH
I looked through the article the finding was reported in and several other articles but could not find any reference to the type of T cells involved in neurocognitive function. The three papers only referred to T cells in general. I'll keep looking though!
1. J. Kipnis, et al. T cell deficiency leads to cognitive dysfunction: Indications for therapeutic vaccination for schizophrenia and other psychiatric conditions.
2. Y. Ziv, et al. Immune cells contribute to the maintenance of neurogenesis and spatial learning abilities in adulthood.
3. G. Lewitus, et al. CD4+CD25– effector T-cells inhibit hippocampal long-term
potentiation in vitro.
AlisaR495, interesting paper. Any idea whether these are nTregs (those that develope intrathymically) or aTregs (naive precursors that develope in the presence of TGF-beta). Interestingly, aTregs are further subdivided into two classes, one that differentiate as a result of TGF-beta and express FOXP3 and another class called Tr1, which differentiate in teh presence of high levels of IL-10 and also produce high levels of IL-10... this subset, however, does not produce FOXP3... so if the authors of the paper are looking at Tregs only by the FOXP3 marker, is it possible that they are missing the Tr1 subset? I'm faced with the problem w/ my own research at the moment.
Post a Comment