10 October 2007

huOKT3gamma in T1DM

Diabetes Mellitus, or Type 1 Diabetes (T1DM), is an autoimmune disorder in which one’s T cells destroy the insulin-producing pancreatic b cells. (5) Insulin is necessary for the metabolism of glucose and a balance between insulin and glucose must be maintained to avoid either hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia.
b cells account for about 60% of the cells are produced in the islets of the pancreas. The onset of T1DM occurs when one’s b cells have nearly all been destroyed. Once this occurs treatment with exogenous insulin to maintain the proper insulin-glucose balance is required. Food intake must be carefully monitored carefully as is affects this balance.
The monitoring devices, delivery methods and the daily management of T1DM has become more streamlined and convenient, it still requires insulin in the right amounts at the right intervals. The advent of “closed loop” systems would, in essence, act as an artificial pancreas but would still require exogenous insulin. There are two other options that offer promise of dramatically changing treatment. One is islet cell transplantation which restores the pancreas’s ability to produce b cells and thereby endogenous insulin. A second option, and the focus here, is the preservation of islet cell function – the production of b cells which produce insulin. This necessitates interfering in the process that results in b cell destruction as close to onset of frank diabetes as possible.
Anti-rejection therapies used in organ transplantation are a possibility because of their effect on autoimmune responses. One agent with promise has been used in renal and renal-pancreatic transplants: huOKT3g which interferes in the events leading to autoimmune destruction of b cells. (3) huOKT3g is an ati-CD3 antibody; CD 3 is a group of proteins that associates with T-cell receptors to generate an activation signal in T lymphocytes that results in the destruction of b cells. huOKT3g is a humanized, nonmitogenic, Fc receptor non-binding OKT3 antibody. (3) This means that it is an antibody derived from a mouse in which the genetic information for six complimentarity determining regions (CDRs) has been grafted within a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody. (1) This reduces the amount of mouse material to £ 10%. The antibody is nonmitogenic because it contains no substances that signal a cell to divide which would trigger mitosis. (1) In addition, the CH2 region of the IgG1 has been altered by site-directed mutagenesis which changes Fc receptor binding activity which also eliminates T cell activation. Studies have shown that these manipulations of the antibody result in it retaining its immunosuppressive properties, but not its immune activating properties.(1) The most encouraging thing about huOKT3g treatment (by infusion) is that its effect on b cell preservation persists for at least a year post-infusion. Current trials are testing whether reinfusion at 1 year can further extend the preservation of b cells.

References:
Woodle ES, Bluestone JA, Zivin RA, Jolliffe LK, Auger j, Xu D, Thistlethwaite JR, Humanized, Nonmitogenic OKT3 Antibody, huOKT3g (Ala-Ala): Initial clinical Experience, Transplantation Proceedings, 30, 1369-1370, 1998.
Seegan GW, Smith CA, Schumaker VN, Changes in quaternary structure of IgG upon reduction of the interheavy-chain disulfide bond, Proceedings National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 76, No 2. 907-911, February 1979.
Woodle ES, Xu D, Zivin RA, Auger J, Charette J, Olaughlin R, Peace D, Jolliffe LK, Haverty T, Bluestone JA, Thistlethwaited JR, Phase I Trial of Humanized, Fc Receptor Nonbinding OHT3 Antibody, huOKT3[gamma[ in the Treatment of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection, Transplantation, Vol. 68(5), 608-616, 15 September 1999
Chatenoud L, Primo J, Bach, JF, CD3 Antibody-Induced Dominant Self Tolerance in Overtly Diabetic NOD Mice, The Journal of Immunology, 22-1767, 2947-2954, 1997.
Herold KC, Hagopian W, Auger JA, Poumian E, Taylor L, Donaldson D, Gitelman SE, Harlan DM, Xu D, Zivin RA, Bluestone JA, Anti-CD3 Monoclonal Antibody in New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, NEJM, 346, No 22, May 30, 2002.

6 comments:

Tony said...

I'm unclear on the action of this antibody. Are you saying that this antibody is an antagonist of CD3 activation in T cells? I can see how that would have a desired immunosuppresive action in patients developing T1DM, but how does it not have negative universal immunosuppresive effects? Since all T cells have CD3 (right?), wouldn't suppresion of it affect T cells that are making an appropriate response to an infection, for example? In Woodle's article (1), they found a reduction in CD2+, CD4+, and CD8+ cells. Glandt and Herold (2) suggest that regulating the T cell moderated destruction of "foreign" material, rather that outright depletion of T cells would be a preferred treatment for diabetics and transplant recipients. Any good ideas out there? As Dr. Cohen said, a good answer to these nagging questions might just earn you a trip to Oslo (wink!).

1. Woodle ES, et al. Phase I Trial of Humanized, Fc Receptor Nonbinding OHT3 Antibody, huOKT3[gamma[ in the Treatment of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection, Transplantation, Vol. 68(5), 608-616, 15 September 1999

2. Glandt, M. and K. Herold. 2004. Treatment of type 1 diabetes with anti-T-cell agents: From T-cell depletion to T-cell regulation. Current Diabetes Reports 4(4):291-297.

MarybethM7630 said...

I too am unclear as to the action of the antibody. How does suppressing the action of all T-cells (CD3 antagonist) serve to as you have stated, "produce beta cells that produce insulin"? Would not SELECTIVELY inhibiting certain T-cells be more beneficial in these patients? Are there any drugs that even do that for T-cells?? Also, did you know that this drug has also been tested for other autoimmune conditions including systemic lupus, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis and psoriasis in addition to T1DM? I was specifically involved in the laboratory research here at the University (through the Immune Tolerance Network) for a phase I/II study for huOKT3 in psoriatic arthritis. The study showed that huOKT3 reduced joint inflammation and pain in patients with advanced disease. However, the trial has been put on hold here at the University due to safety concerns and prevalence of "significant adverse events" related to drug therapy. Perhaps this might indicate that it might not be the BEST form of action to collectively suppress the actions of T-cells in treatment of ALL autoimmune disorders.

FritzJ7630 said...

In terms of suppressing T cell function and adverse side effects: the drug "Protopic", which is Tacrolimus (calcineruin inhibitor) and used to treat eczema, has been correlated (somewhat weakly) to melanoma and lymphomas, and now has a black-box warning. The correlation between widely suppressing T-cell growth/function and increased cancer risk is based upon it's function: this drug will chronically restrict the growth/activation of healthy T cells. All a promoted cell needs is to be "faster" than its healthy neighbors. So if you are inhibiting the healthy T-cell growth but not necessarily the damaged ones...
Like I said, just correlations right now, but its an interesting way to think about carcinogenesis.

TerriO7630 said...

Thank you Tony, Marybeth and Fritz for your comments. Sorry it took me awhile to respond as I was out of town. Your questions prompted me to return to the literature I referenced in writing this blog. I found some explanation in the Chatenoud (1997) piece. While it doesn't explain (at least not that I fully comprehend) it does address the issue of wholesale interference with T-cell activation. Here is a quote from the paper with regard to mice.
"... a 5-consecutive day treatment with CD3mAb induced a complete remission of overt disease, namely, return to permanent normoglycemia in the absence of exogenous insulin treatment. The remission was durable; mice were monitored for up to 8 months from treatment. Importantly, the effect was not related to generalized, longstanding immunosuppression since, at 8-10 weeks following CD3mAb treatment, the mice could reject histoincompatible skin grafts normally. Moreover, these animals, unlike control untreated diabetic NOD females, did not destroy synergeneic islet cell grafts, thus showing that CD3mAb-triggered unresponsiveness was specific for Beta cell associated Ags." The authors postulate that the effect is likely on account of 1 (or a combination) of 4 mechanisms. "1. Physical removal of Beta cell specific autoreactive lynphocytes, 2. Inhibition of their functional capacity through direct effect of Ab to promote anergy, 3. cytokine-mediated immune deviation of islet reactive cells, or 4. induction of more ill-defined down-regulatory pathways controlling the activity of diabetogenic lymphocytes."
I will have to study a good deal more immunology before I could fully explain each of these posited mechanisms.

TeriH7630 said...

terrio7630 (and all)...most interesting. So if this is truly a promising therapy to preserve beta cell function, it would require catching the onset of T1DM early. Would this mean during the "honeymoon" phase in Juvenile diabetes? Perhaps this therapy could have some promise in those with T2DM...to try and preserve/enhance beta cell function before the cells cease to produce insulin? Only some clinical questions...interesting. I hear much more about islet cell transplant in this context. Thanks for the great overview. TLH

TerriO7630 said...

terih: Yes, the therapy must be started very early in the course of the disease. I oversee the trial currently being conducted here and I belive the inclusion criteria specifies diagnosis/onset within 6 months.
The largest probelm so far (and this is commonly available information - nothing proprietary) is that when the onset occurs in adults, the immune responses to the treatment are dose limiting. It is now part of the procedure to pretreat with pred. or diphenhydramine. Interestingly, the adults treated here have a decided late-phase response. Since several infusions occur over the course of more than a week one can develop strategies for individual pts. In one case the pt was sucessfully infused for the full length of time in spite of some wicked immune responses if he was treated with diphenhydramine (25-50mg) 8 hours post infusion. While I accepted that this was an efficacious treatment I now understand the immune process with which it interfers! By interfering with the release of histamine by mast cells through inhibition of complement the worst of the response is averted.